Apple “Family Packs” don’t satisfy me
It’ll only be a short post, I promise!
In my ‘family’, I have two Macs – a Core 2 Duo white iMac, and a Core 2 Duo 15″ MacBook Pro. Not five Macs. Not one Mac. Two Macs!
So almost any time a new piece of software comes out from Apple — for example, OS X Leopard, or a new edition of iLife, iWork etc — it will always sell in two versions: a single license (the cheap one), and a ‘Family Pack’ of five licenses, which is usually about A$100 more.
You get the picture: annoyingly, the single license edition won’t install on both my machines, and the five-license version packs too many.
So instead of paying A$158 for a new version of Apple’s beautiful, wonderful OS X operating system (which is a brilliant price for one user), I have to shell out A$249. Now, by Microsoft Windows standards, this is tiny — but I’ve got used to paying less for more with Apple. That’s the way they make you think after a while.
The only exception to this that I’ve seen is Aperture, which is just great. Apple’s pro apps pack a license for a desktop Mac and a portable Mac, which is very smart.
But, for reasons that defy me, Apple — and most other software vendors for Macs or PCs — never do a two- or three-license edition.
Because no matter how much Steve tries to con me into buying three extra Macs, it probably won’t happen in the near future.
Come on Bakes!
We need moar posts!
mottech
May 15, 2008 at 8:02 pm